# hastic-server vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hastic-server | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #87 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 35 299 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +528 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 39/100 for hastic-server, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hastic-server.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; hastic-server needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hastic-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hastic-server-vs-qdrant