# hastic-server vs Nezha

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring-observability), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hastic-server | Nezha |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #87 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 10 377 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +41 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 40 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | WTFPL |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nezha scores 72/100 against 39/100 for hastic-server, so it is the safer default.

Nezha ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hastic-server.

If you want the quickest setup, Nezha is easier to run; hastic-server needs more configuration.

Nezha is growing faster right now (+41 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hastic-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server.md)
- [Nezha](https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hastic-server-vs-nezha