# hastic-server vs Healthchecks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hastic-server | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #87 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 10 466 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 39/100 for hastic-server, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hastic-server.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; hastic-server needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hastic-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hastic-server.md)
- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hastic-server-vs-healthchecks