hass-otbr-dockervsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-otbr-docker | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #90 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 174 | 61 544 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +482 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 13 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 38/100 for hass-otbr-docker, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for hass-otbr-docker.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; hass-otbr-docker needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).
hass-otbr-docker details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-otbr-docker, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with