# hass-otbr-docker vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-otbr-docker | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #90 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 174 | 93 803 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 529 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 38/100 for hass-otbr-docker, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for hass-otbr-docker.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; hass-otbr-docker needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 529 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-otbr-docker](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-otbr-docker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-otbr-docker.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-otbr-docker-vs-omnivoice-studio