# hass-otbr-docker vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-otbr-docker | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #90 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 174 | 132 714 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 259 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1467 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 13 Oct 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 38/100 for hass-otbr-docker, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for hass-otbr-docker.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; hass-otbr-docker needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-otbr-docker](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-otbr-docker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-otbr-docker.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-otbr-docker-vs-llamacpp