hass-otbr-dockervsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-otbr-docker | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #90 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 174 | 132 699 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1466 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 13 Oct 2026 | b11980 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 38/100 for hass-otbr-docker, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1466 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for hass-otbr-docker.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; hass-otbr-docker needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
hass-otbr-docker details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-otbr-docker, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with