# hass-otbr-docker vs langflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-otbr-docker | langflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #90 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 174 | 156 136 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +914 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 13 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 38/100 for hass-otbr-docker, so it is the safer default.

langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for hass-otbr-docker.

If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; hass-otbr-docker needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-otbr-docker](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-otbr-docker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-otbr-docker.md)
- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-otbr-docker-vs-langflow