# Hass-MCP vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hass-MCP | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 24 059 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +781 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.

If you want the quickest setup, Hass-MCP is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+781 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hass-MCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-mcp-vs-temporal