# Hass-MCP vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hass-MCP | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 1 033 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +63 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.

If you want the quickest setup, Hass-MCP is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hass-MCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-mcp-vs-readmeabook