# Hass-MCP vs Navidrome Music Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hass-MCP | Navidrome Music Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 24 414 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +639 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 79/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.

Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; Hass-MCP needs more configuration.

Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+639 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hass-MCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp.md)
- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-mcp-vs-navidrome-music-server