# Hass-MCP vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hass-MCP | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 4 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.

Hass-MCP ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Hass-MCP needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hass-MCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-mcp-vs-motioneye