# hass-configurator vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted [Configuration Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/configuration-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 12 826 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

hass-configurator ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

zookeeper is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-zookeeper