# hass-configurator vs tidb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | tidb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #4 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 40 688 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +101 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

tidb scores 80/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.

tidb is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [tidb](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-tidb