# hass-configurator vs Technitium DNS Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | Technitium DNS Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 10 251 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +263 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

Technitium DNS Server ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, Technitium DNS Server is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.

Technitium DNS Server is growing faster right now (+263 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [Technitium DNS Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-technitium-dns-server