# hass-configurator vs Tasmota

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | Tasmota |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 24 940 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +167 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Tasmota scores 79/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

Tasmota ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.

Tasmota is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [Tasmota](https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-tasmota