# hass-configurator vs Semaphore UI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | Semaphore UI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 14 334 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +151 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.

Semaphore UI is growing faster right now (+151 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [Semaphore UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-semaphore-ui