# hass-configurator vs PostHog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 40 496 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +587 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3494 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3883.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PostHog scores 81/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

PostHog ships more often: 3494 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.

PostHog is growing faster right now (+587 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [PostHog](https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-posthog