# hass-configurator vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 61 548 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +486 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+486 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-pi-hole