# hass-configurator vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 109 900 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +9 993 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 993 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-orca