# hass-configurator vs Navidrome Music Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | Navidrome Music Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 24 424 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +649 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 79/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.

Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-navidrome-music-server