# hass-configurator vs n8n

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 209 014 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 123 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 208 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | n8n@1.123.90 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 208 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 123 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-n8n