# hass-configurator vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 4 721 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +36 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

motionEye ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-motioneye