# hass-configurator vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hass-configurator | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 132 757 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1468 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hass-configurator-vs-llamacpp