# harness vs Wakupator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | Wakupator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 38 753 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 ✓ | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.

harness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.

harness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [Wakupator](https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wakupator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-wakupator