harnessvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 38 745 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for harness, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.
If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
harness details →TradingAgents details →