# harness vs textsnap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | textsnap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 38 756 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +322 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.

harness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.

harness is growing faster right now (+322 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [textsnap](https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-textsnap