harnessvsSnort
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | Snort | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 38 759 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +325 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.5.3 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
harness scores 80/100 against 47/100 for Snort, so it is the safer default.
harness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Snort.
If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; Snort needs more configuration.
harness is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).
harness details →Snort details →