# harness vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 38 748 ✓ | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +321 ✓ | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; scanopy needs more configuration.

harness is growing faster right now (+321 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-scanopy