# harness vs sandboxed.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | sandboxed.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 38 759 ✓ | 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +325 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

harness is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-sandboxedsh