harnessvsRowfill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | Rowfill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 5 in Data Analysis |
| GitHub stars | 38 752 | 365 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +325 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
harness scores 80/100 against 42/100 for Rowfill, so it is the safer default.
harness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Rowfill.
If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; Rowfill needs more configuration.
harness is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).
harness details →Rowfill details →