harnessvsQuestarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | Questarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 38 759 | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +325 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
harness scores 80/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
Questarr ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.
harness is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).
harness details →Questarr details →