# harness vs Platypush

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | Platypush |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #52 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 38 761 ✓ | 317 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +327 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 ✓ | v1.3.17 · 11 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 53/100 for Platypush, so it is the safer default.

Platypush ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; Platypush needs more configuration.

harness is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [Platypush](https://selfhost.directory/project/platypush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/platypush.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-platypush