# harness vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 38 748 | 61 805 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +321 | +1 493 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 80/100 for harness, so it is the safer default.

penpot ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 493 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-penpot