# harness vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 38 756 ✓ | 9 168 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +322 ✓ | +58 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

harness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

harness is growing faster right now (+322 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-octoprint