harnessvsmagic-frame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | magic-frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 38 753 | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 21 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
harness scores 80/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.
If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.
harness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).
harness details →magic-frame details →