# harness vs Infisical

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | harness | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 753 ✓ | 30 118 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 | +702 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 79 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+702 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)
- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harness-vs-infisical