# Harbor vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 29 634 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +190 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Harbor is growing faster right now (+190 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-windows-arm