HarborvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 29 635 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +191 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+191 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with