# Harbor vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 29 637 ✓ | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.

If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

Harbor is growing faster right now (+183 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-voidaccess