# Harbor vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 29 643 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.

Harbor is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-unbagrnd