# Harbor vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 29 634 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +190 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for Harbor, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-tradingagents