# Harbor vs Tdarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | Tdarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 29 640 ✓ | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +186 ✓ | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Makefile |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.

Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.

Harbor is growing faster right now (+186 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-tdarr