Harborvssupa-manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | supa-manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #39 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 641 | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supa-manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →supa-manager details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep supa-manager, compare it with