HarborvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 29 639 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +185 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+185 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with