HarborvsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 29 643 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →Request Tracker details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with