Harborvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 639 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +185 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+185 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with