# Harbor vs OTOBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | OTOBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 29 643 ✓ | 340 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.

Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.

If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.

Harbor is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [OTOBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/otobo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/otobo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-otobo