# Harbor vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 29 640 ✓ | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +186 | +257 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-octobot