Harborvsmultiwoven
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | multiwoven | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 29 641 | 1 683 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 26 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →multiwoven details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep multiwoven, compare it with